Head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) underpin spatial hearing in virtual and augmented reality systems. Whilst individual HRTFs capture listener-specific morphology, their practical limitations have led to widespread use of generic HRTFs and growing interest in synthetic approaches. Yet their relative perceptual impact remains rarely compared within a single study. In this study, twenty listeners completed two virtual reality sound localisation experiments with complementary subsets of interleaved HRTF conditions enabling within-subject comParison of five conditions: individually measured, KEMAR, randomly selected non-individual measured, high-resolution scan-based synthetic and photogrammetry-based synthetic HRTFs. Test–retest stability of the individually measured baseline across sessions supported pooling across experiments and attributing differences to perceptual rather than session effects. Across HRTF conditions, lateral localisation metrics were largely insensitive to HRTF type, whereas polar-domain metrics and confusion rates showed strong HRTF dependence. Random HRTFs outperformed KEMAR on several polar metrics. High-resolution synthetic HRTFs matched individual measured performance, whilst photogrammetry-based synthetic HRTFs, alongside KEMAR, showed the greatest degradation. These findings clarify practical choices for non-individual baselines and highlight the importance of mesh resolution when using numerical synthesis for elevation-dependent localisation tasks.
